Essay Topics
Types of Essays
Essay Checklist
Word Counter
Readability Score
Essay Rewriter
Nowadays there have been a lot of new television projects dealing with the confession in different crimes made by ordinary citizens. People may consider these programs to be "conscience-relievers", nevertheless the participants have still committed crimes and this fact must not be forgotten by any means. These kinds of programs have caused a lot of negative reaction from the side of the law enforcement. This is especially due to the fact that even after a confession people are not arrested because they have not been "Mirandized" before their speech. Being "Mirandized" means that a suspect is read a list of his rights, which basically resemble the next: the understanding that anything the persons says may be used against him in Court, his right to keep silence, the right for an attorney and others. An only after this lists of right the suspect chooses whether to speak or not to speak at all. According to this list those criminals that admit or confess of a crime without being read their rights remain free and do not take responsibility for what they have done. I personally feel a little confused by this warning. This is primary due to the understanding that some cases are too "heavy" to throw them out just because the criminals have not been read their rights. In these cases I consider it to be appropriate to make Miranda work "automatically"" if there is any evidence supporting the criminals statements. Almost every single phenomenon concerning law enforcement has exceptions. This is why I believe that the Miranda warning should be automatically applied to those television participants who confess of dangerous crimes, because it is impossible to say whether they really did it or if they just wanted to be on TV. It is not just to through out cases just for the reason that the right has not been read and I think that the field of using the Miranda warning needs some revision.To show this on practice it is not necessary to go into the depth of crime history but just to turn to the case that is widely known - Ernesto Miranda v. Arizona, which happened in 1963. Mr. Miranda was accused and then confessed of kidnapping and raping a young, mentally disabled woman. The fact that Ernesto Miranda was not told that he could use a lawyer or silence the Supreme Court. Court decided that the confession of Mr. Miranda must not be considered to be an evidence of the crime. After this case Miranda Warning saw the world, nevertheless Mr. Ernesto Miranda was lately arrested because certain evidence was found. This means that the Miranda warning does really need revision because while staying free Mr. Miranda could have killed some other people. So the decision is obvious - either TV confession must be cancelled which will make criminals come to police and not on TV or the Miranda warning must by applied automatically in certain types of cases. All the details and exceptions need to be discussed in the Supreme Court.It is important to note that a confession on TV is usually made to make people feel sorry for the criminal. And a crime is not something to be sorry of but a fact to take responsibility for. And if certain changes need to be made then why not to carry them out?
Essay Writing Checklist
The following guidelines are designed to give students a checklist to use, whether they are revising individually or as part of a peer review team.
Introduction
  • Is the main idea (i.e., the writer's opinion of the story title) stated clearly?
  • Is the introductory paragraph interesting? Does it make the reader want to keep on reading?
Body Paragraph
  • Does each body paragraph have a clear topic sentence that is related to the main idea of the essay?
  • Does each body paragraph include specific information from the text(including quoted evidence from the text, if required by the instructor)that supports the topic sentence?
  • Is there a clear plan for the order of the body paragraphs (i.e., order of importance, chronology in the story, etc.)?
  • Does each body paragraph transition smoothly to the next?
Conclusion
  • Is the main idea of the essay restated in different words?
  • Are the supporting ideas summarized succinctly and clearly?
  • Is the concluding paragraph interesting? Does it leave an impression on the reader?
Overall Essay
  • Is any important material left unsaid?
  • Is any material repetitious and unnecessary?
  • Has the writer tried to incorporate "voice" in the essay so that it has his/her distinctive mark?
  • Are there changes needed in word choice, sentence length and structure, etc.?
  • Are the quotations (if required) properly cited?
  • Has the essay been proofread for spelling, punctuation, grammar, etc.?
  • Does the essay have an interesting and appropriate title?
major issues of the Miranda Warning case Essay
Trending Essay Topics
Reference
Feel free to use content on this page for your website, blog or paper we only ask that you reference content back to us. Use the following code to link this page:
Terms · Privacy · Contact
Essay Topics © 2018

Major Issues Of The Miranda Warning Case Essay

Words: 559    Pages: 2    Paragraphs: 3    Sentences: 30    Read Time: 02:01
Highlight Text to add correction. Use an editor to spell check essay.
              Nowadays there have been a lot of new television projects dealing with the confession in different crimes made by ordinary citizens. People may consider these programs to be "conscience-relievers", nevertheless the participants have still committed crimes and this fact must not be forgotten by any means. These kinds of programs have caused a lot of negative reaction from the side of the law enforcement. This is especially due to the fact that even after a confession people are not arrested because they have not been "Mirandized" before their speech. Being "Mirandized" means that a suspect is read a list of his rights, which basically resemble the next: the understanding that anything the persons says may be used against him in Court, his right to keep silence, the right for an attorney and others. An only after this lists of right the suspect chooses whether to speak or not to speak at all. According to this list those criminals that admit or confess of a crime without being read their rights remain free and do not take responsibility for what they have done.
             
             
              I personally feel a little confused by this warning. This is primary due to the understanding that some cases are too "heavy" to throw them out just because the criminals have not been read their rights. In these cases I consider it to be appropriate to make Miranda work "automatically"" if there is any evidence supporting the criminals statements. Almost every single phenomenon concerning law enforcement has exceptions. This is why I believe that the Miranda warning should be automatically applied to those television participants who confess of dangerous crimes, because it is impossible to say whether they really did it or if they just wanted to be on TV. It is not just to through out cases just for the reason that the right has not been read and I think that the field of using the Miranda warning needs some revision. To show this on practice it is not necessary to go into the depth of crime history but just to turn to the case that is widely known - Ernesto Miranda v. Arizona, which happened in 1963. Mr. Miranda was accused and then confessed of kidnapping and raping a young, mentally disabled woman. The fact that Ernesto Miranda was not told that he could use a lawyer or silence the Supreme Court.
             
              Court decided that the confession of Mr. Miranda must not be considered to be an evidence of the crime. After this case Miranda Warning saw the world, nevertheless Mr. Ernesto Miranda was lately arrested because certain evidence was found. This means that the Miranda warning does really need revision because while staying free Mr. Miranda could have killed some other people. So the decision is obvious - either TV confession must be cancelled which will make criminals come to police and not on TV or the Miranda warning must by applied automatically in certain types of cases. All the details and exceptions need to be discussed in the Supreme Court. It is important to note that a confession on TV is usually made to make people feel sorry for the criminal. And a crime is not something to be sorry of but a fact to take responsibility for. And if certain changes need to be made then why not to carry them out?
Law Essay 
Tip: Use our Essay Rewriter to rewrite this essay and remove plagiarism.

Add Notes

Have suggestions, comments or ideas? Please share below. Don't forget to tag a friend or classmate.
clear
Formatting Help
Submit
Happy Endings | midnight in paris | Terius Behind Me ซับไทย Ep.11+12